Jacqui Wise, Cape Town - Bulletin of the World Health Organization (BLT)
There is a danger that men will see circumcision as an invisible condom
and take part in more risky sexual behaviour The message has just got to be
put across carefully that circumcision is part of the jigsaw puzzle of
prevention.
Franois Venter, Clinical Director of Reproductive Health and HIV-Research
at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
The results of two studies, in Kenya and Uganda, are eagerly anticipated
following last years study carried out in Orange Farm, South Africa, which
was stopped early because it showed a significant protective effect of
circumcision. It is not known whether the current Kenya and Uganda studies that
are due for completion in 2007 will confirm the results of the Orange Farm
study, but there are signs that the demand for safe and affordable circumcision
services is growing fast, particularly in Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland, the
United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia, and in South Africa too.
Public health experts say that countries in southern Africa with very high
HIV prevalence and low circumcision rates and where the spread of HIV is
predominantly via heterosexual sex may want to consider doing acceptability,
feasibility and costing studies for making male circumcision widely available.
The results of the Orange Farm study in South Africa have been widely
publicised in the region and discussed by leaders, members of parliaments (MP),
health workers, the press and general public. As a result, there are already
indications of increasing demand for male circumcision in traditionally
non-circumcising societies in southern Africa. At the University Teaching
Hospital in Zambia, demand has grown from 1 to 15 a month with a three-month
waiting list. Demand at one Swaziland hospital is reported to have risen from
less than one per month to 40 a month. Marwick Khumalo, a Member of Parliament
(MP) for Lobamba in Swaziland was quoted in the local press: All male
children should be circumcised. To show my seriousness, I have taken all my sons
for circumcision. Kenyan MP Jimmy Angwenui said: In order to stop the
spread of HIV/AIDS male circumcision should be made mandatory by the government.
In Swaziland, the health ministry backed a workshop in January to train 60
doctors and nurses in circumcision, responding to what it called a surge in
demand. There were so many volunteers to be demonstration-and-practice patients
during the training session that a hundred men had to be turned away. Daniel
Halperin, Prevention and Behavior Change Advisor for the South Africa Regional
HIV/AIDS Programme says: There is already high demand for male circumcision
in Swaziland following a lot of publicity in the local press and radio. Public
health facilities are already overwhelmed and men are being turned away and put
on a waiting list which is currently around eight months long.
There would be many advantages to male circumcision, were it to be confirmed
as a means of preventing HIV: it is relatively inexpensive, it can be carried
out over a wide age range and it is a one-off intervention conferring lifelong
reduced biological risk. Franois Venter, Clinical Director of Reproductive
Health and HIV-Research at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
advocates male circumcision as one of the best protective measures. Male
circumcision is the most powerful intervention we have at this point in time. It
is phenomenally effective, he told the Bulletin. One of the beauties of
circumcision is that it is a one-off operation which takes 16
20
minutes but then has a profound effect on the rest of a mans life. Whereas to
promote condom use or microbicides, repeated long-term promotion is needed.
Data from cross-sectional observational studies conducted since the mid-1980s
have shown that circumcised men have a lower prevalence of HIV infection than
uncircumcised men. But the Orange Farm study backed by Agence National de
Recherches sur le Sida (ANRS) was the first randomized controlled trial to show
such an effect. The trial randomized 3274 men to either circumcision or to a
control group (PLoS Med 2005 2:e298). A panel of experts stopped the trial
after an average of 18 months follow up. There were 20 HIV infections in the
intervention group and 49 in the control group, corresponding to a 60
75%
protection rate. The study authors state:
Male circumcision provides a degree of protection against acquiring HIV
infection equivalent to what a vaccine of high efficacy would have achieved.
Consequently male circumcision should be regarded as an important public
health intervention for preventing the spread of HIV.
The two further randomized controlled trials, currently ongoing in the Rakai
region of Uganda and the Kisumu region of Kenya, are supported by the National
Institutes of Health of the United States. The Uganda trial is in a rural
setting and involves 5000 participants aged between 15 and 49 years.
The Kenya trial involves 2784 men aged 18
24
in an urban setting. The two trials are due to be completed in 2007, and an
interim review of the data was due to be conducted by the Data and Safety
Monitoring Board in late June 2006. A further randomized trial assessing the
impact of male circumcision on the risk of HIV infection in female partners is
currently under way in Uganda with results not expected until late 2007.
Circumcision can be risky if it is performed in unsterile conditions. It can
lead to infection, bleeding and permanent injury, or HIV infection from
nonsterilized instruments, and possible death if appropriate treatment is
not provided. Every year the authorities in the Eastern Cape of South Africa
report deaths and serious complications from botched circumcisions of young boys
carried out by traditional healers.
Robert Bailey, who is the leader for the current Kenyan trial, did a recent
study of complication rates from traditional and circumcisions performed in
medical settings in Bungoma District of Kenya. Bailey and his colleagues found
that traditional circumcision resulted in a complication rate of 35% while the
latter produced a complication rate of 18%. In our current trial the
complication rate is 1.7%. This demonstrates that it is possible to keep
complications to a minimum in an African setting. A major problem is lack of
sterile equipment and facilities. We have carried out surveys of health
facilities in Kenya and found that all but the major district hospitals are
lacking proper instruments, such as sterilizing equipment, working surgical
instruments and supplies, to perform safe circumcisions.
There are other concerns about circumcision. During the healing period,
sexually active men are likely to be at higher risk of HIV infection. During
this time
approximately three to four weeks
men should be instructed to refrain from sexual activity. There are opponents of
male circumcision who see it as a violation of human rights, particularly if
carried out on children or adolescents. But perhaps the largest potential
problem with circumcision is the false perception of security. Male circumcision
is not a magic bullet and does not provide full protection. If men perceive they
are fully protected then it could lead to a decrease in condom use or an
increase in risky sexual behaiour. This was seen in the Orange Farm study when
the intervention groups had significantly more sexual contacts. Dr Venter says:
There is a danger that men will see circumcision as an invisible condom and
take part in more risky sexual behaviour. However, it would be the same with an
HIV vaccine. The message has just got to be put across carefully that
circumcision is part of the jigsaw puzzle of prevention. Male circumcision
needs to be promoted as part of the range of methods to reduce the risk of HIV,
including avoidance of unprotected penetrative sex, reduction in the number of
sexual partners and consistent condom use.
The cost of male circumcision varies depending on where the operation takes
place and who performs it. However, data from Nyanza, Kenya suggest that
circumcision can be done in medical facilities for about US 25 per procedure.
This includes US 8 for medical expendables such as sutures and needle,
bandaging and analgesics, US 7 for surgical preparation (preparing the room,
cleaning linens, sterilizing instruments, and US 10 in overheads (physicians
fee, maintenance of room and equipment). Professor Tom Quinn from Johns Hopkins
University told the 2006 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
that he calculated that 16 operations would prevent one incident HIV infection
over 10 years. The cost per HIV infection averted could be as low as US 1052,
if protection occurs in both sexes, making circumcision extremely cost
effective.
There is a danger that men will see circumcision as an invisible condom
and take part in more risky sexual behaviour The message has just got to be
put across carefully that circumcision is part of the jigsaw puzzle of
prevention.
Franois Venter, Clinical Director of Reproductive Health and HIV-Research
at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
The current position of WHO is that safe circumcision should be provided
where people want it but that a policy decision on whether to promote it should
wait until the results of the Kenya and Uganda trials are available.
In the meantime a UN Work Plan on Male Circumcision is being implemented to
help countries improve the safety of their circumcision practices. WHO has
produced a technical manual, Male circumcision under local anaesthesia, which
addresses the provision of safe male circumcision services for newborns,
adolescents and adults and gives detailed technical information on the different
surgical approaches.
If the two ongoing trials are positive then governments in sub-Saharan Africa
may want to decide whether to commit funds to train medical staff and provide
appropriate equipment and facilities. Dr Puren says: It will put further
stress on a health-care system already straiing to roll out an ARV
(antiretroviral) programme.
Bailey warns: People want the services. If they are not provided with the
services they will seek unqualified practitioners who will exploit the
situation. We have to build the capacity to provide safe and affordable
services. Venter adds: There are already long queues for circumcision in
South Africa so there will need to be careful planning. We need to train more
people to carry out the operations safely. There is no need for doctors to do
it. It is a simple procedure that trained technicians could carry out.
When should circumcision take place? One option would be to promote routine
circumcision of infants, possibly as part of the antenatal care package.
Botswana, in fact, took a policy decision to offer this some years ago but it
has not been implemented. Circumcising at this age would reduce the
complications that result from traditional circumcision rites in adolescence.
But the major benefits of preventing HIV infections would take more than 20
years to be realised.
The other alternative is to offer circumcision through health facilities, and
possibly schools and youth centres to young men before they become sexually
active. Dr Venter believes a proactive recruitment programme should be carried
out. We need to incentivize circumcision. For example every man who comes
forward should be given 100 rand (US 14.50).
Related news articles: see
Chiefs blame state for circumcision deaths http://www.sundaytimes.co.za/articles/article.aspx?ID=ST6A191679
http://www.sabcnews.com/south_africa/general/0,2172,130446,00.html
Health agency won't stop circumcision studies http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=AIDS-06-29-06
Uganda: Research Into Effects of Circumcision On AIDS Continues http://allafrica.com/stories/200606290631.html
Circumcision Studies to Continue Says Health Panel
http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=11859
Circumcision rite: 6 die, 50 rescued in first week http://www.dispatch.co.za/2006/06/26/Easterncape/circ.html