| Summary |
The Kopano health district has the highest (TB) incidence rate in the Free State (555 per 100 000). Health care managers and providers there have identified TB as one of the priority health problem areas in the district. The Initiative for Sub-district Support (ISDS) approached the Centre for Health Systems Research & Development to assist in conducting a situation analysis regarding the control of TB in Kopano. The research was conducted in November/December 1999. |
| More Details |
Methodology:
A cross-sectional once-off, assessment was conducted in the Kopano Health District to rapidly assess the situation regarding TB control and management. Data was obtained from primary and secondary sources. In addition to looking at district-wide data, four primary level facilities were purposively sampled for more detailed research. Interviews were conducted with TB managers, health care workers providing TB services, a pharmacist, a laboratory technician, DOTS supporters and TB patients.
Key findings:
A district TB coordinator oversees the provision of TB services in the district. Each PHC facility has a TB coordinator. In some clinics this role and function is rotated from one staff member to another. There is an indication that this happens because nurses are reluctant to get involved with TB management. TB data appears to be lacking in complete reliability and accuracy. Furthermore, some nurses are inadequately informed about the correct use of the TB register. The high proportion of re-treatment patients reflects the general failure of the TB programme to cure patients. This corresponds to the fact that a significant number of patients are not on a DOTS system. A proportion of re-treatment cases did not have sputum culture tests done, despite the fact that these are the patients who are at higher than average risk of having drug resistant bacilli. There appears to be some confusion and misunderstanding about the value and purpose of the different diagnostic procedures for TB.
Varying practices apply to active case&ndashfinding and prophylactic treatment. No clear policy exists with regard to testing and counselling TB patients for HIV.
In search of solutions:
Each clinic nurse who is committed to and interested in TB management needs to be identified and developed to be an efficient local TB coordinator.
Basic day-to-day management of TB patients must become the shared responsibility of all clinic staff. Health facility staff need to receive continued training and encouragement to provide effective health promotion, TB education, use TB registers properly, and to use correct diagnostic procedures. With regard to TB record keeping, a thorough audit of all TB data collection needs to be done so that the system can be rationalised and simplified. The DOTS system needs to be thoroughly assessed in terms of its strengths and weaknesses.
GPs need to come to a shared agreement with public services about a clinical policy for TB diagnosis. Clear guidelines must be established for case-finding and prophylactic treatment. It is important that MDR TB patients are appropriately detected and managed. The district needs to develop an appropriate policy on voluntary testing and counselling for TB patients with HIV.
|
| Publication Webpage |
|
| |
|
| Keywords |
This Item is associated with the Following
Keywords: . |
| |
|